A comparative report by Francis Kibirige, John Martin Kewaza, Fred Male, Pius Tibaingana, and Stevenson Ssevume, published by Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, shows that economic factors are the driving force behind rural-to-urban migration in East Africa. However, after relocating to cities, people often don’t achieve aspirations, and are longing for improvement of public services. When expectations are not met, disappointments with the governments’ ability to deliver arise, and so does it affect willingness to pay more taxes to improve public services.
As Sub-Sahara Africa’s (SSA) population is rapidly increasing, so is its urbanisation rate. Across SSA, people are moving out of the rural areas to the cities. Processes of urbanisation are fast and unstoppable. It is believed that in the next 30 years, out of two billion people living in Africa, only a quarter is going to reside in the rural areas.
However, the high expectations of people migrating from rural to urban areas in countries such as Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania are usually met with disappointments and dissatisfaction, as was revealed by surveys conducted by Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung in those countries in 2019, 2020 and 2021 respectively. The results show the importance to rethink urban environments and managing people’s expectations. Almost a quarter of all respondents considered moving, among which more than half expressed their desire to move to a city. The biggest motivation for the move, expressed by almost half of the respondent, is economic opportunities, particularly finding work or better jobs, 37 per cent. The other reasons for moving were social, such as joining a spouse or family member, 14 per cent and seeking better services, 12 per cent. Interestingly, when looking at individual countries, incentives differ noticeably. In Tanzania, social reasons ranked almost as high as economic reasons, whereas in Kenya and Uganda social aspects of migration played a smaller role. Gender roles are also noticeable, since 60 per cent of men mentioned economic reasons dictating the decision, whereas for women the percentage amounted only to 48 per cent. However, looking at the demographics again, the majority of migrants to cities are young educated women. What does it mean for sustainable urban development?
Reality Is Somewhat Different While historically, urbanisation has been associated with significant economic and social transformations, including service delivery, the reality is somewhat different. While over a half of the urban respondents described the government service provision as good or excellent – with a staggering difference comparing Tanzania (72 per cent) to Kenya (46 per cent) and Uganda (49 per cent) – the majority of East African urban dwellers look forward to even higher improvement in that sector (79 per cent in Kenya, 76 per cent in Uganda and 81 per cent in Tanzania).
The study also shows a general dissatisfaction with the services provided, considering the money paid in direct taxes with only 6 per cent, 12 per cent, and 20 per cent of Kenyans, Ugandans, Tanzanians respectively, answering that they receive “a fair amount” of services. Despite that, almost three quarters of the respondents strongly opposed the idea of paying more taxes with a promise of more services. This can be interpreted as an indication of a huge disparity between revenues collected and services delivered to the people, which augments people’s distrust in the government. How then, are cities supposed to finance the expansion of urban infrastructures, or the delivery of public services, improve the living standard and battle inequalities? UN Habitat is trying to tackle this issue with their coming ‘World Cities Day’ on the 31st of October under the theme “Financing sustainable urban future for all”.
Unmet Expectations, Civic Disengagement How do people respond? Our datashows that there is increasing frustration from the unmet expectations come with civic disengagement. When asked about their membership and associations to groups, ranging from religious organisations to selfhelp groups, to trade unions, political groupings or social media and other networks, people from rural areas, 20 per cent, were slightly more engaged than their urban counterparts, 18 per cent. The trend continued when asked about the contact with their local leaders, with Tanzania falling back behind Kenya and Uganda in that aspect – 8 per cent in urban areas compared to Uganda’s 20 per cent, and Kenya’s 18 per cent. On the other hand, urban dwellers are significantly more active in social media groups with 32 per cent, compared to 11 per cent of the rural population. When looking at civic action, Tanzanians are less likely to take any action than Kenyans or Ugandans, believing that local leadership serve as a channel to express the issues, which is intriguing, since they also showed the smallest engagement with the local leaders among the three countries.
THE REVENUE-SERVICE GAP DILEMMAThe results of surveys conducted by Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania in 2019, 2020 and 2021, show a general dissatisfaction with the services provided, considering the money paid in direct taxes with only 6 per cent, 12 per cent, and 20 per cent of Kenyans, Ugandans, Tanzanians respectively, answering that they receive “a fair amount” of services.Almost three quarters of the respondents strongly opposed the idea of paying more taxes with a promise of more services.How then, are cities supposed to finance the expansion of urban infrastructures, or the delivery of public services, improve the living standard and battle inequalities?
THE REVENUE-SERVICE GAP DILEMMA
Involve the urban citizenry The study shows that rural-to-urban migration functions as an answer to a lack of economic opportunities and insufficient social services. However, after relocating to cities, people often don’t achieve aspirations and once again are longing for improvement. When people’s expectations are not met, and disappointments arise, attitudes towards authorities change and so does their willingness to pay more taxes to improve public services. These are problems that can, and should be addressed on the national and local level. The governments could involve the urban citizenry in financing and investment planning for sustainable future. The focus should move to urban dwellers to create people-centered urban spaces.
Citizens’ priorities should be heard and taken into account. Cities are growing at an unprecedented rate and action has to be taken to make them more equitable, inclusive, and to provide equal opportunities. The challenge of disenfranchisement and decreased political activity among urban dwellers has to be met before rising disappointment and frustration eventually lead to more dramatic ways of expression. There is huge potential for civic engagement of urban dwellers to enhance democratic governance of cities, including ensuring community involvement in projects, transparent governance and pro-poor financial mechanisms.
The authors: Radosław Kawałek, Geraldine Kabami, Titus Kaloki, and Amon Petro work for Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung’s offices in Tanzania, Uganda and Kenya
This article first appeared on The East African Newspaper on 31st October 2023.
Read more about the study "The Urban Dreams and Realities of Rural to Urban Migration in Sub-Saharan Africa," that assesed the variances in public service delivery and democratic development between urban and rural areas across Eastern and Western African countries, including Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania, Senegal, and Namibia.
See More
P.O.Box 4472 6 Mwai Kibaki Road Dar es Salaam
+255 (0) 22 2668575+255 (0) 22 2668786
info.tanzania(at)fes.de
This site uses third-party website tracking technologies to provide and continually improve our services, and to display advertisements according to users' interests. I agree and may revoke or change my consent at any time with effect for the future.
These technologies are required to activate the core functionality of the website.
This is an self hosted web analytics platform.
Data Purposes
This list represents the purposes of the data collection and processing.
Technologies Used
Data Collected
This list represents all (personal) data that is collected by or through the use of this service.
Legal Basis
In the following the required legal basis for the processing of data is listed.
Retention Period
The retention period is the time span the collected data is saved for the processing purposes. The data needs to be deleted as soon as it is no longer needed for the stated processing purposes.
The data will be deleted as soon as they are no longer needed for the processing purposes.
These technologies enable us to analyse the use of the website in order to measure and improve performance.
This is a video player service.
Processing Company
Google Ireland Limited
Google Building Gordon House, 4 Barrow St, Dublin, D04 E5W5, Ireland
Location of Processing
European Union
Data Recipients
Data Protection Officer of Processing Company
Below you can find the email address of the data protection officer of the processing company.
https://support.google.com/policies/contact/general_privacy_form
Transfer to Third Countries
This service may forward the collected data to a different country. Please note that this service might transfer the data to a country without the required data protection standards. If the data is transferred to the USA, there is a risk that your data can be processed by US authorities, for control and surveillance measures, possibly without legal remedies. Below you can find a list of countries to which the data is being transferred. For more information regarding safeguards please refer to the website provider’s privacy policy or contact the website provider directly.
Worldwide
Click here to read the privacy policy of the data processor
https://policies.google.com/privacy?hl=en
Click here to opt out from this processor across all domains
https://safety.google/privacy/privacy-controls/
Click here to read the cookie policy of the data processor
https://policies.google.com/technologies/cookies?hl=en
Storage Information
Below you can see the longest potential duration for storage on a device, as set when using the cookie method of storage and if there are any other methods used.
This service uses different means of storing information on a user’s device as listed below.
This cookie stores your preferences and other information, in particular preferred language, how many search results you wish to be shown on your page, and whether or not you wish to have Google’s SafeSearch filter turned on.
This cookie measures your bandwidth to determine whether you get the new player interface or the old.
This cookie increments the views counter on the YouTube video.
This is set on pages with embedded YouTube video.
This is a service for displaying video content.
Vimeo LLC
555 West 18th Street, New York, New York 10011, United States of America
United States of America
Privacy(at)vimeo.com
https://vimeo.com/privacy
https://vimeo.com/cookie_policy
This cookie is used in conjunction with a video player. If the visitor is interrupted while viewing video content, the cookie remembers where to start the video when the visitor reloads the video.
An indicator of if the visitor has ever logged in.
Registers a unique ID that is used by Vimeo.
Saves the user's preferences when playing embedded videos from Vimeo.
Set after a user's first upload.
This is an integrated map service.
Gordon House, 4 Barrow St, Dublin 4, Ireland
https://support.google.com/policies/troubleshooter/7575787?hl=en
United States of America,Singapore,Taiwan,Chile
http://www.google.com/intl/de/policies/privacy/